Michael Owen believes Marcus Rashford is guilty for Phil Foden’s equaliser throughout Sunday’s Manchester derby.
Having opened the scoring with a thunderous effort from 30 yards out, Rashford was then on the centre of Metropolis’s equaliser after being left incensed that he was fouled by Kyle Walker moments earlier than Foden pulled a purpose again for the hosts.
Metropolis went on to benefit from that momentum, with Foden netting once more earlier than Erling Haaland wrapped up the factors with a 3rd purpose for Pep Guardiola’s facet to depart them only one level adrift of league leaders Liverpool.
The controversial second earlier than Metropolis’s equaliser has divided opinion, although, with Erik ten Hag fuming that the problem on Rashford was not given as a foul whereas Gary Neville believed it was proper to play on.
Former United striker Owen has sided with the argument that there was no foul on Rashford, and the truth that the striker was not pressing in getting again into place has price his facet dearly.
![Michael Owen (pictured) believes Marcus Rashford is at fault for Man City's equaliser](https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/03/04/06/82000519-13153489-image-a-5_1709535316113.jpg)
![United fumed that Rashford (pictured) had been fouled in the build-up to Foden's goal](https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/03/04/06/81983353-13153489-United_fumed_that_Marcus_Rashford_had_been_fouled_in_the_build_u-m-4_1709535306921.jpg)
Michael Owen (left) believes Marcus Rashford (proper) is at fault for Man Metropolis’s equaliser
![](https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/03/04/06/82000659-13153489-image-a-8_1709535466383.jpg)
Phil Foden scored an impressive purpose to equalise for Manchester Metropolis in Sunday’s derby
![Rashford takes a tumble to the ground as Kyle Walker tries to win possession back for City](https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/03/04/06/81983355-13153489-Rashford_takes_a_tumble_to_the_ground_as_Kyle_Walker_tries_to_wi-a-7_1709535392269.jpg)
Rashford takes a tumble to the bottom as Kyle Walker tries to win possession again for Metropolis
Your browser doesn’t help iframes.
‘I assumed it was right nothing was given,’ Owen stated on Optus Sport. ‘I do not know why Marcus Rashford was making an attempt to run throughout his man to start out with, he wasn’t even in command of the ball. Absolutely you have to management the ball first and the lower throughout your man.
‘I felt it was referred to as spot on. And, really, he would have been again on this place (defending for the Foden purpose) to probably lower that ball out.
‘He is been mendacity on the bottom for a minute or so. If he was again in, his place must be there, if he wasn’t mendacity on the ground previous to that. So he might need been capable of stop that purpose.’
United boss Ten Hag was particularly aggravated that his star ahead hadn’t been given the foul and was subsequently proven a yellow card for his outburst within the dugout.
He advised Sky Sports activities: ‘It is extremely debatable, I believe there was contact and it’s a defining second of the sport. Additionally at 2-1 there is a reckless motion from Metropolis’s goalkeeper.
![Rashford protests claiming for a free-kick prior to Foden scoring his first goal but Owen claims the Man United forward took too long in getting back into position](https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/03/04/06/81983671-13153489-Rashford_protests_claiming_for_a_free_kick_prior_to_Foden_scorin-a-9_1709535482636.jpg)
Rashford protests claiming for a free-kick previous to Foden scoring his first purpose however Owen claims the Man United ahead took too lengthy in getting again into place
‘It was comfortable, however whenever you’re in a full dash and also you get a bit of contact you lose the rhythm and that is why he went down.’
Walker was additionally requested for his opinion on the matter however, unsurprisingly, performed down the incident.
He stated: ‘I have never regarded again at it to be utterly sincere. I did not really feel there was a lot in it. I really feel like I did what I usually do and get my arm throughout, however the referee has seen it and checked it on the VAR and so they simply need to take it as that and now we have gone up the opposite finish, it is sods legislation is not it.’
Source link